This paper discusses an archaeology of ceramic craft and artisans in the sixteenth–seventeenth centuries Belgrade and problematises its relation to historical models of urban production in the Ottoman Empire. The study focuses on five common wares, representative of the Middle Danube region, found in well-defined consumption contexts of Belgrade’s intra and extra muros settlements. The production technology of these wares, including ceramic bodies, slips, and glazes, was studied with ceramic petrography and chemical analysis, and the results were interpreted using the chaîne opératoire conceptual framework. The petrographic study was also used for a preliminary provenance determination of raw materials. It is proposed that Monochrome Glazed Ware, Slip-Painted Ware, and Domestic Unglazed Ware were locally made in Belgrade following the Ottoman conquest in 1521. The emergence of this production coincides with the abrupt cultural change in the Middle Danube region marked by migrations and new socio-economic conditions initiated by the Ottomans. Traits of the local production are compared to the existing corpus of knowledge on the urban craftsmanship and guilds formulated in Ottoman historiography for the purpose of developing a cross-disciplinary approach to crafts and artisans in the Ottoman Empire.

本文讨论了十六至十七世纪贝尔格莱德的陶瓷工艺和工匠的考古学，并对其与奥斯曼帝国城市生产的历史模式的关系提出了疑问。这项研究着重于五种常见的商品，它们代表了多瑙河中部地区，它们是在贝尔格莱德内部和外部穆罗斯定居点的明确定义的消费环境中发现的。通过陶瓷岩石学和化学分析研究了这些器皿的生产技术，包括陶瓷体，瓷釉和釉料，并使用沙恩歌剧院对结果进行了解释。概念框架。岩相学研究还用于原料的初步物产测定。建议在1521年奥斯曼帝国征服之后，在贝尔格莱德本地生产单色琉璃，滑彩瓷器和家用无釉瓷器。这种产品的出现与多瑙河中部地区文化的突然变化相呼应，即迁徙和新迁徙。奥斯曼帝国发起的社会经济条件。将当地生产的特征与奥斯曼历史学中制定的有关城市手工艺和行会的现有知识语料库进行比较，目的是在奥斯曼帝国发展手工业和手工艺人的跨学科方法。