Abstract

This article examines how gender budgeting (GB) activists in the United Kingdom have sought to practice intersectionality. It draws on Black feminists’ critiques of white feminists’ tendency to deploy intersectionality as a “cooled out buzz word” that relies on modernist, Western feminist epistemology. Results highlight the limitations of modernist positivist epistemologies, which are often used in economic policy and GB, and the importance of knowledge creation practices and explicit engagement with white women’s privilege in intersectional practice. These findings aim to inform European feminists’ responses to Black feminists’ critiques.

中文翻译：

---

性别预算活动中交叉实践的可能性和制约因素

摘要

本文研究了英国的性别平等预算（GB）活动家如何寻求实现交叉性。它借鉴了黑人女权主义者对白人女权主义者倾向于将交叉性作为依赖现代主义，西方女权主义认识论的“冷静的流行语”的批评。结果凸显了现代主义实证主义认识论的局限性，后者在经济政策和GB中经常使用，以及知识创造实践和在交往实践中明确参与白人妇女特权的重要性。这些发现旨在为欧洲女权主义者对黑人女权主义者批评的回应提供依据。