Histories of the British Gay Liberation Front (GLF) portray it as radical and inclusive, seeking alliances with counter-cultural groups, and as an early proponent of the concept of ‘queer’. However, its radical politics relied on a binary division between ‘gay’ and ‘straight’ that associated different-gender attraction with regressive politics and could not accommodate bisexuality or attraction to multiple genders. This article compares GLF’s approach to bisexuality and multiple-gender-attraction with that of the more ‘moderate’ Campaign for Homosexual Equality (C.H.E.) during the 1970s. Initially, C.H.E. was more accepting, although this declined over the course of the decade as it, too, became more associated with liberationist politics. Attention to bisexuality and attraction to multiple genders during this period therefore challenges historical narratives about the ‘queer’ inclusivity of gay liberation and of 1970s radical politics more generally.

中文翻译：

---

1970年代的双性恋，多性别吸引力和同性恋解放政治

英国同性恋解放阵线（GLF）的历史将其描述为激进而包容的，寻求与反文化团体结盟，并且是“酷儿”概念的早期拥护者。但是，它的激进政治依赖于“同性恋”和“直率”之间的二元划分，这种划分将不同性别的吸引力与回归政治联系在一起，不能容纳双性恋或对多个性别的吸引力。本文将GLF对待双性恋和多性别吸引力的方法与1970年代更为“适度”的同性恋平等运动（CHE）的方法进行了比较。最初，CHE更让人接受，尽管随着十年来它与解放主义政治的联系也越来越紧密，但这种情况有所下降。