当前位置: X-MOL 学术London Review of International Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The radical ideation of peasants, the ‘pseudo-radicalism’ of international human rights law, and the revolutionary lawyer
London Review of International Law ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-22 , DOI: 10.1093/lril/lraa024
Margot E Salomon 1
Affiliation  

This article questions the use of international human rights law in realising social transformation. It studies the new United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, drawing on the commodity-form theory of law. Through this lens, foregrounding the relationship between capitalism and law and their shared constituent form, the contradiction in what is at times a radical normative project in international human rights law is revealed. With the unintended consequences of human rights lawyering made visible, this work turns to the means through which the advocate can launch a potentially transformative ‘legal’ strategy. An exploration of two seminal modes of reconciliation follows: reconciling the use of international human rights law with a commitment to social transformation and reconciling the post-capitalist politics of progressive lawyers with their use of the law.

中文翻译:

农民的激进思想,国际人权法的“伪激进主义”和革命律师

本文质疑国际人权法在实现社会转型中的用途。它以商品形式的法律理论为基础,研究了新的《联合国农民及在农村地区工作的其他人的权利宣言》。通过这一视角,从资本主义与法律及其共同构成形式之间的关系入手,揭示了国际人权法中有时是一个激进的规范性项目之间的矛盾。随着人权律师业的意想不到的后果显而易见,这项工作转向了倡导者可以发起具有潜在变革性的“法律”战略的手段。对两种主要的和解模式的探讨如下:
更新日期:2021-03-27
down
wechat
bug