The purpose of this paper is to foreground the gendered crime consequences of the global pandemic and to raise questions emanating from them for the future(s) of criminology. The paper reviews some of the criminological response to the pandemic offered during 2020. The global pandemic was constituted by some as providing the opportunity for a natural experiment in which criminological theories and concepts could be tested in real time and by others as an opportunity to further raise the profile of crimes more hidden from view, particularly domestic abuse. For the former, domestic abuse is constituted as an exception to what might be learned from this experimental moment. For the latter, gendered violence(s) are central to making sense of this moment as ongoing, mundane and ordinary features of (women’s) everyday lives. This paper makes the case that the evidence relating to the gendered consequences of Covid-19, renders it no longer possible for the discipline to regard feminist informed work (largely found within the latter view above) as the stranger, outside of, or an exception to, the discipline’s central concerns. It is suggested that the future(s) of criminology lie in rendering that stranger’s voice, focusing as it does on the continuities of men’s gendered violence(s) in all spheres of life, as the discipline’s central problematic.

本文的目的是展望全球流行的性别犯罪后果，并提出针对犯罪学未来的问题。本文回顾了2020年对大流行的一些犯罪学应对措施。全球大流行病的构成是，有的人提供了自然实验的机会，可以实时检验犯罪学的理论和概念，有的人则提供进一步的机会。使犯罪的形象更加隐蔽，尤其是家庭虐待。对于前者，家庭虐待是从这个实验性时刻中学到的例外。对于后者，性别暴力对于将这一时刻理解为（妇女）日常生活中持续的，平凡的和普通的特征至关重要。本文以与Covid-19的性别后果有关的证据为依据，使该学科不再可能将女权主义知情的工作（主要在上述后一种观点中找到）视为陌生人，外来人或例外人。到学科的中心问题。有人认为，犯罪学的未来在于渲染陌生人的声音，因为它是该学科的主要问题，因此应侧重于生活各个领域中男性性别暴力的连续性。