Despite the numerous advances towards the recognition of LGBT rights worldwide, real equity has not yet been achieved. It is therefore necessary to take into consideration not only the socio-political context but also the concrete practices that have been developed in specific settings. The university represents an important scene, which generates knowledge and development in societies. This study, from a Liberating Community Psychology approach, analysed five good practices related to LGBT issues and psychology placed in four countries with different socio-cultural backgrounds: Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia and Spain. The results from an ecological SWOT analysis—based on interviews and questionnaires with diverse stakeholders and experts—showed the internal weaknesses (e.g., lack of resources) and strengths (e.g., high promoters' commitment, students acceptance) of the good practices, as well as their external opportunities and threats in the academic (e.g., social status of the university, curricula gaps), but also in the socio-political context (e.g., protecting policies, attacks from conservative sectors). Additionally, action-research proposals to improve equity in/from universities were suggested by stakeholders and prioritized by experts through a Delphi panel. The main theoretical and practical contributions are discussed. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

中文翻译：

---

伊比利亚美洲大学的多样性和公平性：心理学的生态分析和行动研究建议

尽管在全世界承认 LGBT 权利方面取得了许多进展，但尚未实现真正的公平。因此，不仅要考虑社会政治背景，还要考虑在特定环境中发展起来的具体做法。大学代表了一个重要的场景，它在社会中产生知识和发展。本研究采用解放社区心理学方法，分析了在巴西、乌拉圭、哥伦比亚和西班牙这四个具有不同社会文化背景的国家中与 LGBT 问题和心理学相关的五种良好做法。生态 SWOT 分析的结果——基于对不同利益相关者和专家的访谈和问卷调查——显示了内部弱点（例如，缺乏资源）和优势（例如，高发起人的承诺，学生对良好实践的接受程度，以及他们在学术上的外部机会和威胁（例如，大学的社会地位、课程差距），而且在社会政治背景下（例如，保护政策、来自保守部门的攻击） ）。此外，利益相关者提出了改善大学公平性的行动研究建议，并由专家通过德尔福小组进行了优先排序。讨论了主要的理论和实践贡献。请参阅补充材料部分以查找本文的社区和社会影响声明。来自保守部门的攻击）。此外，利益相关者提出了改善大学公平性的行动研究建议，并由专家通过德尔福小组进行了优先排序。讨论了主要的理论和实践贡献。请参阅补充材料部分以查找本文的社区和社会影响声明。来自保守部门的攻击）。此外，利益相关者提出了改善大学公平性的行动研究建议，并由专家通过德尔福小组进行了优先排序。讨论了主要的理论和实践贡献。请参阅补充材料部分以查找本文的社区和社会影响声明。