当前位置: X-MOL 学术Energy Sustain. Soc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Good living of communities and sustainability of the hydropower business: mapping an operational framework for benefit sharing
Energy, Sustainability and Society ( IF 4.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-25 , DOI: 10.1186/s13705-021-00284-7
Indira Jiménez-Inchima , Jorge-Andrés Polanco , Manuela Escobar-Sierra

The negative impact of hydropower companies is cushioned frequently through compensation that is proportional neither to the needs of communities nor to the energy business. Considering the dependence of hydropower on the environment, it is unclear how the good living of communities can be combined with the long-term sustainability of power companies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish a benefit sharing scheme between hydropower companies and local communities. We conducted a systematic literature review using a sequential mixed-method approach. In the first stage, we performed a quantitative bibliometric analysis, and its results, described in Model 1.0, were the basis of the second stage. Consequently, in the second stage, we conducted a content analysis of 40 documents to enrich the previous version of the model in Framework 2.0. After completing both the methodological stages, we prepared a theoretical operational framework for benefit sharing based on collaborative governance that assigned different specific weights for companies and local communities. Equal benefit sharing is the result of an adaptive process that depends on (1) the performance of companies, (2) the level of empowerment of communities and (3) the state’s capacity to intervene in setting rules of engagement that help reduce power asymmetries between companies and the society.

中文翻译:

社区的良好生活和水电业务的可持续性:为利益共享规划运营框架

水电公司的负面影响经常通过与社区需求或能源业务不成比例的补偿得到缓解。考虑到水电对环境的依赖性,目前尚不清楚如何将社区的美好生活与电力公司的长期可持续性相结合。因此,本研究的目的是建立水电公司与当地社区之间的利益共享计划。我们使用顺序混合方法进行了系统的文献综述。在第一阶段,我们进行了定量文献计量分析,其结果(在模型1.0中进行了描述)是第二阶段的基础。因此,在第二阶段,我们对40个文档进行了内容分析,以丰富Framework 2.0中该模型的先前版本。在完成两个方法阶段之后,我们基于协作式治理为利益共享准备了理论上的操作框架,该框架为公司和当地社区分配了不同的特定权重。平等利益共享是适应性过程的结果,适应性过程取决于(1)公司的绩效,(2)社区的赋权水平以及(3)国家干预制定参与规则的能力,这些规则有助于减少企业之间的权力不对称。公司与社会。我们基于协作治理为利益共享制定了理论上的操作框架,该框架为公司和本地社区分配了不同的特定权重。平等利益共享是适应性过程的结果,适应性过程取决于(1)公司的绩效,(2)社区的赋权水平以及(3)国家干预制定参与规则的能力,这些规则有助于减少企业之间的权力不对称。公司与社会。我们基于协作治理为利益共享制定了理论上的操作框架,该框架为公司和本地社区分配了不同的特定权重。平等利益共享是适应性过程的结果,适应性过程取决于(1)公司的绩效,(2)社区的赋权水平以及(3)国家干预制定参与规则的能力,这些规则有助于减少企业之间的权力不对称。公司与社会。
更新日期:2021-03-25
down
wechat
bug