ABSTRACT

For as long as the principles of Korean space have been investigated, the madang has been considered as a central issue. However, scholars tend to define this space as a courtyard in the Western sense. Believing that this leads to a misinterpretation that the madang is equivalent to the Western courtyard, a comparative analysis has been conducted in this study for highlighting their peculiarities and differences. The Korean madang has been compared with the Italian version of the courtyard, the corte, which is considered to be the prototype of the Western notion of this type of space. An investigation has been conducted on residential examples (hanok and palazzo) from the 15^th to 19^th centuries and has been summarized through diagrams. This study highlights two fundamental differences between the corte and the madang. First, while the corte is comparable to a regular solid, the madang can be considered as an expandable fluid. Secondly, the corte and the madang have different relationships with the environment surrounding the palazzo and the hanok; the corte is strongly separated from it, whereas the madang is closely linked to it and is almost a part of the natural context in which the building is located.

摘要

自从研究韩国空间的原则以来，madang就一直被认为是一个核心问题。然而，学者们倾向于将这个空间定义为西方意义上的庭院。认为这会导致马当等同于西方庭院的误解，本研究进行了比较分析，以突出它们的特点和差异。韩国的马当与意大利版的院子corte进行了比较，corte被认为是西方这种空间概念的原型。已对住宅示例（韩屋和宫殿）进行了调查）从15^日到19^日世纪和已通过图总结。这项研究强调了corte和madang之间的两个根本区别。首先，虽然corte可与常规固体相媲美，但madang可被视为可膨胀的流体。其次，corte和madang与宫殿和韩屋周围的环境有不同的关系；该科尔特强烈与其分离，而马当 与它紧密相连，几乎是建筑所在自然环境的一部分。