当前位置: X-MOL 学术Atten. Percept. Psychophys. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli—Distractor–response binding within and between the senses
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-25 , DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02249-6
Ruth Laub , Simon Merz , Helena Dröschel , Christian Frings

Binding theories assume that features of stimuli and executed responses can be integrated together in one event file (Hommel, Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216, 1998; Hommel, Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500, 2004). Every reencounter with one or more of the stored features leads to an automatic retrieval of the previously constructed event file and hence of the response—even the repetition of a task-irrelevant distractor stimulus can retrieve a previously encoded response. This so-called distractor–response binding effect is typically investigated using a sequential prime-probe design that allows the orthogonal variation of response relation (response repetition vs. resporrevertnse change) and distractor relation (distractor repetition vs. distractor change), while probe response times and error rates are measured as dependent variable. Previous research has shown that task-relevant stimuli can be represented at different levels (e.g., perceptual and conceptual; see Henson et al., Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 376–384, 2014), yet it is not clear at which level of representation distractor stimuli are processed. In the present study, we focused on the level of representation of response-irrelevant distractor stimuli. To this end, a crossmodal distractor–response binding paradigm was used that enables the differentiation between the perceptual and conceptual representation of the distractor by allowing the systematic repetition and change of conceptual distractor features independent of perceptual repetitions. The results suggest that the repetition of perceptual distractor features is indispensable for the initiation of the retrieval process while the sole repetition of conceptual distractor features is not sufficient to start the retrieval process.



中文翻译:

无关刺激的表达水平-感官内和感官之间的干扰物-反应结合

约束理论认为,刺激和执行反应的特征可以集成到一个事件文件中(Hommel,Visual Cognition, 5,183-216,1998; Hommel,Cognitive Sciences,8,8)。494–500,2004年)。具有一个或多个已存储特征的每个重新遇到都会自动检索先前构建的事件文件,从而自动检索响应,即使重复与任务无关的干扰物刺激也可以检索先前编码的响应。这种所谓的干扰物-反应结合效应通常是使用顺序的初探针设计进行研究的,该设计允许响应关系(反应重复与resporrevertnse变化)和干扰物关系(干扰物重复与干扰物变化)的正交变化,而探针响应是正交的。时间和错误率被测量为因变量。先前的研究表明,与任务相关的刺激可以在不同的水平上体现出来(例如,知觉和概念上的刺激;请参见Henson等人,《认知科学的趋势》)。18,376-384,2014),但目前尚不清楚在该牵开表示刺激的电平进行处理。在本研究中,我们集中于反应无关的干扰物刺激的表示水平。为此,使用了一种交叉模式的干扰者-响应约束范式,通过允许系统地重复和改变概念性干扰者特征而与感知者重复无关,从而实现了干扰者的感知和概念表征之间的区分。结果表明,感知性干扰物特征的重复对于检索过程的启动是必不可少的,而概念性干扰物特征的唯一重复不足以启动检索过程。

更新日期:2021-03-25
down
wechat
bug