The 2008 fiscal crisis, inflamed by austerity measures, has prompted rural marginalization and societal segmentation across the European Union (EU). The current article investigates how a European rural revival can be materialized, without losing sight of the national and local conditions. Within the contemporary EU governance framework—in which a European institution cannot be categorized as endogenous or exogenous to a sub-state nation—the concept of neo-endogenous rural development seems more topical than ever. The term describes a new perspective of governance that reconciles the endogenous to the exogenous dynamics. Along these lines, the present article dwells on the question of how can the neo-endogenous rural development agenda be disseminated across the EU. By identifying the lack of international comparative research in the field of rural development, the current study explores different European, rural development trajectories and draws meaningful comparisons. A comparative qualitative research was conducted in three rural regions, stratified in terms of economic and governance decentralization: Mühlviertel in Austria, Baixo Alentejo in Portugal, and Phthiotis in Greece. The comparative research indicated the importance of interregional networking and socially innovative governance for the embeddedness of a neo-endogenous rural development agenda.

中文翻译：

---

新内生农村发展：复兴欧洲农村之路*

由紧缩措施引发的 2008 年财政危机已促使整个欧盟 (EU) 的农村边缘化和社会分裂。目前的文章探讨了如何在不忽视国家和地方条件的情况下实现欧洲农村复兴。在当代欧盟治理框架内——一个欧洲机构不能被归类为内生或外生于次国家的国家——新内生农村发展的概念似乎比以往任何时候都更加热门。该术语描述了一种新的治理视角，它将内生动力与外生动力相协调。沿着这些思路，本文探讨了如何在整个欧盟范围内传播新内生农村发展议程的问题。通过确定农村发展领域缺乏国际比较研究，本研究探索了不同的欧洲、农村发展轨迹并进行了有意义的比较。在三个农村地区进行了比较定性研究，按照经济和治理分权进行分层：奥地利的 Mühlviertel、葡萄牙的 Baixo Alentejo 和希腊的 Phthiotis。比较研究表明区域间网络和社会创新治理对于嵌入新内生农村发展议程的重要性。在经济和治理分权方面进行分层：奥地利的 Mühlviertel、葡萄牙的 Baixo Alentejo 和希腊的 Phthiotis。比较研究表明区域间网络和社会创新治理对于嵌入新内生农村发展议程的重要性。在经济和治理分权方面进行分层：奥地利的 Mühlviertel、葡萄牙的 Baixo Alentejo 和希腊的 Phthiotis。比较研究表明区域间网络和社会创新治理对于嵌入新内生农村发展议程的重要性。