Abstract:

This article challenges the way côla and periods are delineated by exegetes involved in the so-called “sound mapping” approach. Specifically, the author argues that certain criteria for identifying côla and periods that are provided in both the initial version of the method outlined by Margaret E. Lee and Bernard B. Scott (2009) and the refined version proposed by Dan Nässelqvist (2015) conflict with the data from ancient sources. In other words, the criteria typically used for delineating côla and periods fail to accurately reflect the ancient conventions of structuring prose texts. Given the crucial role of the notions of côlon and period for the approach of “sound mapping,” further investigation into the rhetorical treatises from the Graeco-Roman world is warranted. Such an investigation, as this study aims to show, allows us to get a deeper understanding of the ancient system of colometry and to lay the foundation for a more historically-informed set of criteria.

摘要：

本文对所谓的“声音映射”方法所涉及的表情描绘轮廓和句点的方式提出了挑战。具体来说，作者认为，玛格丽特·E·李和伯纳德·B·斯科特（2009）概述的方法的初始版本以及丹·纳塞尔奎斯特（DanNässelqvist）（2015）提出的精炼版本中提供的某些用于识别可乐和句点的标准存在冲突。来自古代的数据。换句话说，通常用于描绘可乐和时期的标准无法准确反映散文文本构造的古老惯例。考虑到colo的概念和时期对于“声音映射”方法的关键作用，有必要对Graeco-Roman世界的修辞论作进行进一步的研究。这项研究旨在表明，