Abstract

This article focuses on the question of John Kinsella’s invisibility in World Literature from the perspective of his International Regionalism (IR). First, it compares the similarity and difference between Kinsella and Joseph S. Nye’s international regionalism, and pinpoints the development of Kinsella’s IR from Disclosed Poetics, Activist Poetics, Spatial Relations to Polysituatedness. Second, it concentrates on analyzing the background of Kinsella’s IR through three kinds of ideologies: veganism, anarchism, and pacifism, in order to mark the unique identity problem of Kinsella – identity dilemma in-between pre- and post-nation as Australia. Third, it clarifies the reason why Kinsella is invisible in the World Literature canon as Emily Apter mentions in “On Translation in a Global Market,” in line with the question why Kinsella was mainly in the footnotes of Robert Dixon and Brigid Rooney’s Scenes of Reading: Is Australian Literature a World Literature. In conclusion, on the one hand, Kinsella’s IR about the World and Literature does not fit in the Center, or the Periphery, nor the Semi-Center & Periphery; on the other hand, Kinsella’s IR might more aptly be termed International Community-ism, because Kinsella’s World is built up by very small communities.

摘要

本文从约翰·金塞拉（John Kinsella）的国际区域主义（IR）角度着眼于约翰·金塞拉（John Kinsella）在世界文学中的隐形性问题。首先，比较了金塞拉与约瑟夫·奈的国际区域主义之间的异同，从公开的诗学，激进主义的诗学，空间关系到多态性，准确地指出了金塞拉的关系论的发展。。其次，它着重于通过纯素食主义，无政府主义和和平主义三种意识形态来分析Kinsella的IR背景，以标记Kinsella的独特身份问题-建国前后澳大利亚之间的身份困境。第三，它阐明了金斯拉之所以在世界文学经典中不可见的原因，正如艾米丽·阿普特（Emily Apter）在“全球市场上的翻译”中提到的那样，这与金斯拉主要是在罗伯特·迪克森和鲁迪·鲁尼的《读书场景》的脚注中的问题相吻合。 ：澳大利亚文学是世界文学吗？总而言之，一方面，金塞拉关于世界和文学的IR不适合中心，外围或半中心和外围。另一方面，金斯拉（Kinsella）的关系图可能更恰当地被称为国际社区主义，因为金斯拉（Kinsella）的世界是由很小的社区建立的。