当前位置: X-MOL 学术Educ.. Tech. Res. Dev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Writing private and shared annotations and lurking in Annoto hyper-video in academia: Insights from learning analytics, content analysis, and interviews with lecturers and students
Educational Technology Research and Development ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-22 , DOI: 10.1007/s11423-021-09984-5
Ina Blau , Tamar Shamir-Inbal

Interactive features of the hyper-video environment, such as indexing, bookmarks, links to learning materials, multiple-choice questions, and personal and shared annotations, can enhance learning processes. This paper examines integration of the Annoto hyper-video platform in three large undergraduate courses (A, B & C) at a large university. The study combines learning analytics of video-recordings of synchronous lessons (9–15 sessions per course, approximately two hours each), content analysis of the hyper-video annotations written by students and lecturers, and semi-structured interviews with the lecturers and with actively-participating students. The log-analysis was conducted at the user level (n = 880) and at the video level (n = 37). Content analysis was based on the Community of Inquiry framework (Garrison et al. in Internet High Educ 2(2):87–105, 1999, Internet High Educ 13(1):5–9, 2010). The findings revealed that when hyper-video is integrated without academic credit, slightly over 10% of undergraduates chose active participation, beyond watching videos and reading others' annotations. The majority of annotations were shared posts and replies (73–96%), rather than personal notes. Relative to the number of students, the rate of reading annotations was significantly higher in Course C. Accordingly, content analysis revealed significantly more "cognitive presence" and "social presence" codes in Course C, while the amount of "teaching presence" was similar in all courses. However, the three courses used the same interaction pattern of annotations: "student's question—lecturer's answer", without promoting peer feedback. The implications for educational theory and the pedagogical design of hyper-video in academia are discussed.



中文翻译:

编写私人和共享的注释,并潜入学术界的Annoto超视频中:学习分析,内容分析以及与讲师和学生的访谈中的见解

超视频环境的交互功能,例如索引,书签,学习材料的链接,多项选择题以及个人和共享注释,可以增强学习过程。本文研究了Annoto的集成大型大学的三门大型本科课程(A,B和C)中的超视频平台。这项研究结合了同步课程视频录制的学习分析(每门课程9至15节,每个课程大约两个小时),对学生和讲师编写的超视频注释的内容分析以及对讲师和教师的半结构化访谈积极参与的学生。日志分析是在用户级别(n = 880)和视频级别(n = 37)进行的。内容分析基于社区查询框架(Garrison等人,Internet High Educ 2(2):87-105,1999,Internet High Educ 13(1):5-9,2010)。研究结果表明,在没有学术学分的情况下整合超级视频时,略超过10%的大学生选择了积极参与,而不仅仅是观看视频和阅读他人的视频。注释。大部分注释是共享的帖子和回复(73–96%),而不是个人注释。相对于学生人数,课程C中阅读注释的比率显着更高。因此,内容分析显示课程C中的“认知存在”和“社交存在”代码明显更多,而“教学存在”的数量相似在所有课程中。但是,这三门课程使用相同的注释交互方式:“学生的问题—讲师的答案”,而没有促进同伴的反馈。讨论了教育理论和学术界中的超视频教学设计的意义。因此,内容分析显示,课程C中的“认知存在”和“社交存在”代码明显更多,而所有课程中“教学存在”的数量均相似。但是,这三门课程使用相同的注释交互方式:“学生的问题—讲师的答案”,而没有促进同伴的反馈。讨论了教育理论和学术界中的超视频教学设计的意义。因此,内容分析显示,课程C中的“认知存在”和“社交存在”代码明显更多,而所有课程中“教学存在”的数量均相似。但是,这三门课程使用相同的注释交互方式:“学生的问题—讲师的答案”,而没有促进同伴的反馈。讨论了教育理论和学术界中的超视频教学设计的意义。这三门课程使用相同的注释交互方式:“学生的问题—讲师的答案”,而没有促进同伴的反馈。讨论了教育理论和学术界中的超视频教学设计的意义。这三门课程使用相同的注释交互方式:“学生的问题—讲师的答案”,而没有促进同伴的反馈。讨论了教育理论和学术界中的超视频教学设计的意义。

更新日期:2021-03-23
down
wechat
bug