At the height of the migration crisis, around 2.4 million asylum claims were submitted in the European Union Member States. The enormous weight of a massive inflow of migrants and immigration-related threat perceptions prompted Member States to start reintroducing border controls at EU internal borders, which resulted in a ‘temporary suspension’ of the Schengen agreement on open borders. With the use of zero-sum phenomena and application of public goods theory to asylum policy, the article seeks to explain the influence of a structural limitation of European integration in the form of asymmetric integration of asylum policy on the sustainability of the Schengen agreement on open borders. To eliminate this structural limitation and thus strengthen the sustainability of the Schengen agreement on open borders, the article proposes a fully functioning Common European Asylum System (CEAS) based on a unified asylum system and governed by a centralized EU institution.

中文翻译：

---

如何提高申根开放边界协议的可持续性？

在移民危机最严重的时候，欧盟成员国提交了大约 240 万份庇护申请。大量移民流入的巨大影响以及与移民相关的威胁认知促使成员国开始在欧盟内部边界重新引入边境管制，这导致申根开放边界协议“暂时中止”。通过零和现象的运用和公共物品理论在庇护政策中的应用，本文试图解释以庇护政策不对称一体化的形式出现的欧洲一体化的结构性限制对申根开放协议可持续性的影响。边界。为了消除这种结构性限制，从而加强申根开放边界协议的可持续性，