The aim of this paper is to analyse the type of mobilities and subjects that are being promoted and constituted through bike-sharing systems. This is done through an analysis of the bike-sharing system in the city of Lund in Sweden. The analysis utilises Bacchi's What is the Problem Represented to be? framework and develops it through adding a spatial perspective. Departing from a critical velomobilities perspective, we argue that urban transport policies cannot merely be regarded as one specific and delimited reaction to well-defined policy problems. Instead, the ways that BSSs are, described, motivated – but also spatially organised – constitute which mobilities are produced. The analysis is based in an analysis of relevant policy documents, maps and observations. It is concluded that bike sharing is not seen as cycling and is rarely linked to cycling as such, but rather is seen as part of the public transport system. Further, it is concluded that the motivation behind the location of the stations is to facilitate the flow of workers to public transport, and promote attractiveness and tourism, thus constituting a strong belief in a win-win situation between sustainability and growth. Here prioritisation between different values, and the possible tensions between different social and environmental dimensions of sustainability is down-played.

本文的目的是分析通过自行车共享系统促进和构成的运动类型和主题。这是通过分析瑞典隆德市的自行车共享系统来完成的。分析利用巴基的《代表什么是问题》？框架并通过添加空间角度进行开发。从批判性的机动性角度出发，我们认为，城市交通政策不能仅仅被视为对明确的政策问题的一种特定而有限的反应。取而代之的是，描述，激发，但又在空间上进行组织的BSS的方式构成了产生机动性的方式。该分析基于对相关政策文件，地图和观察的分析。结论是，自行车共享不被视为骑自行车，因此很少与自行车相关联，而是被视为公共交通系统的一部分。此外，得出的结论是，车站的位置背后的动机是为了促进工人向公共交通的流动，并促进吸引力和旅游业，因此，人们坚信可持续性与增长之间将实现双赢。在此，不同价值之间的优先级划分以及可持续性的不同社会和环境维度之间可能存在的紧张关系被轻描淡写了。