Concern with climate change, and coal's contribution to it, has centred coal in an intensely moralised politics of accusation in Australia. This paper discusses the ordinary ethics through which pro‐coal lobbyists in Australia relate to this moralised landscape and offers an analysis of the everyday and ordinary production of complicity with climate change. It argues that complicity is not just something that insufficiently ethical people engage in, but instead highlights the ways in which the coal industry derives a moral weight for its defenders. This complicity is made and reproduced precisely through the everyday practices of ethical deliberation figured in response to interpersonal moral accusations. These insights are made possible through the author's own positionality and surprising affinities with pro‐coal lobbyists, and thus this paper argues for an anthropology of extractive industry which embraces the interplay of anthropological rapport with complicity.

中文翻译：

---

煤炭的道德案例：与澳大利亚亲煤炭游说者共谋的道德

对气候变化及其对煤炭的贡献的关注使煤炭集中在澳大利亚道德化的指控政治中。本文讨论了澳大利亚亲煤炭游说者与这一道德景观相关的普通伦理，并提供了对与气候变化共谋的日常和普通生产的分析。它认为，共谋不仅是没有足够道德的人们参与的事情，而且还强调了煤炭行业为其捍卫者赋予道德上的分量的方式。这种共谋是通过回应人际道德指责而制定的道德审议的日常实践而精确实现和再现的。通过作者自身的立场以及亲煤炭游说者的惊人亲和力，这些见解得以实现，