Rather than conserving or ignoring historically burdened heritage, RAAAF intervene. Their responses are striking, sometimes dramatic or destructive. Prompted by Rietveld’s discussion of the Luftschloss project, I compare some other places with difficult pasts which engage our embodied and sensory responses, without such active redirection or disruption. Ross Gibson’s concept of a ‘memoryscope’ helps us identify distinct but complementary ways of focussing the forces of the past. Emotions and imaginings are transmitted over time in many forms. The past is not easily washed, blasted or sliced away. By considering other settings and modes of encounter, we can recognise and applaud the novelty of RAAAF’s interventions while urging further attention to the variable dynamics and rhythms of remembering and of sociomaterial residues.

RAAAF并未保留或忽略历史上繁重的遗产，而是进行了干预。他们的反应是惊人的，有时是戏剧性的或破坏性的。Rietveld对Luftschloss的讨论提示在我的项目中，我将其他一些经历艰难的过去的地方与我们的具体感官反应进行了比较，而没有这种积极的重定向或破坏。罗斯·吉布森（Ross Gibson）的“记忆图”概念有助于我们确定聚焦过去力量的独特但互补的方式。情感和想象随着时间的流逝以多种形式传递。过去不容易清洗，喷砂或切成薄片。通过考虑其他背景和相遇方式，我们可以认识到并赞扬RAAAF干预的新颖性，同时敦促人们进一步关注记忆和社会物质残留的变化动态和节奏。