Geographies of inclusion have largely been ignored in Management & Organization Studies (MOS), which tend to be encased within global white Western power over knowledge production. In this paper, I contribute to how non-Western contexts can serve as a counterpoint, yet avoid sharp dichotomies, concerning hegemonic Western discourse in geographies of inclusion. Through ethnography, I seek to provide some answers to the question: How does inclusion happen and how can it be theorised in non-Western contexts. Two central ideas of the paper are: 1. MOS can and should learn from non-Western contexts. Indigenous inclusion, specifically linked to Adivasis in India, illustrates how geographical contexts matter for theorising inclusion which can be enriched by examining non-Western contexts; and 2. Liberation theology through discernment and contemplative action, can provide insights and probe the possibilities of the nature of inclusion. I make no claim to a sole interpretation, rather I offer a guiding framework, grounded in an empirical contribution, for a nuanced understanding of Indigenous inclusion. My poignant hope is to invite other adaptations and traditions to further enrich and unveil understandings of geographies of inclusion for MOS.

包容性地理位置在管理与组织研究（MOS）中已被很大程度上忽略，该领域倾向于被全球白人西方对知识生产的控制所包围。在本文中，我将探讨非西方语境如何作为一个对立面，同时又避免尖锐的二分法，涉及包容性地理学中的霸权西方话语。通过人种志，我试图为以下问题提供一些答案：包容如何发生，以及如何在非西方环境下进行理论化。本文的两个中心思想是：1. MOS可以并且应该从非西方环境中学习。土著包容，特别是与印度的Adivasis相关联，说明了地理背景对于理论上的包容具有重要意义，可以通过研究非西方环境来丰富这些内容；和2。通过洞察力和沉思行动，解放神学可以提供见解并探讨包容性质的可能性。我不主张任何唯一的解释，而是出于实证贡献而提供了一个指导框架，以使人们对土著人的包容性有了细微的了解。我强烈的希望是邀请其他改编和传统进一步丰富和揭示对MOS包含地理的理解。