Media, police, and educational responses to nonconsensual pornography (i.e. ‘revenge porn’) have been critiqued for relying on sex negative beliefs that result in victims of this act being blamed and shamed for their own victimisation. In this article I analyse judicial discourse in nonconsensual pornography case law to assess the extent to which sex negativity is embedded in legal responses. I find that, while overt victim blaming and shaming is not present in the judicial discourse, subtle forms of sex negativity are expressed in a minority of cases through references to consensual youth image sharing as inappropriate and through the framing of reputational harms. I argue that it is essential for legal responses to not only avoid sex negative narratives (as most currently do) but to actively reveal and counter the sex negative beliefs that underlie many of the harms associated with nonconsensual pornography.

媒体，警察和教育界对未经许可的色情制品（即“复仇色情片”）的反应受到批评，原因是他们依赖于负面的性观念，导致这种行为的受害者因自己受害而受到指责和羞辱。在本文中，我分析了非自愿性色情判例法中的司法论述，以评估性否定性在法律回应中的嵌入程度。我发现，尽管司法讨论中没有公开谴责受害人和羞辱受害人，但在少数案件中，通过提及自愿共享的青年形象不当以及通过声誉损害来表达微薄的性别否定形式。