当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Criminal Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office Paradox
International Criminal Law Review ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-05 , DOI: 10.1163/15718123-bja10042
Avdylkader Mucaj 1
Affiliation  

In August 2015 the Assembly of Kosovo, following an international request, passed constitutional amendments and the Law on Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office [‘the Law’], marking the legal foundation of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and the Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (‘the Specialist Chambers’). However, what has sparked widespread reaction in Kosovo is the narrow jurisdiction of the Specialist Chambers. Therefore, this article argues first that the Specialist Chambers have mono-ethnic jurisdiction, being charged with investigating and prosecuting only one warring party and effectively granting an amnesty to the other. Next it will be argued that the current jurisdiction of the Specialist Chambers ought to be extended to cover all mass atrocities committed during and after the Kosovo war by all warring parties. Finally, the article briefly discusses the indictment against the President of Kosovo, Hashim Thaçi, and others vis-á-vis the rejection of the main allegation of the Marty Report, on organ trafficking.



中文翻译:

科索沃专家分庭和专家检察官办公室悖论

2015 年 8 月,应国际要求,科索沃议会通过了宪法修正案和《专门分庭和专门检察官办公室法》[“法律”],标志着科索沃专门分庭和专门检察官办公室(“该法”)的法律基础。专家钱伯斯')。然而,在科索沃引发广泛反应的是专家分庭的狭隘管辖权。因此,本文首先论证了专家庭具有单一种族的管辖权,负责调查和起诉仅交战方,并有效地对另一方进行大赦。接下来将争论的是,专家法庭目前的管辖权应该扩大到涵盖所有交战各方在科索沃战争期间和之后犯下的所有大规模暴行。最后,相对于马蒂报告中关于器官贩运的主要指控的驳回。

更新日期:2021-02-05
down
wechat
bug