The debate on introducing the international crime of ecocide and corporate liability at the international level has been intense during the last fifty years. A recent research project elaborated two draft conventions on the supranational crime of ecocide and transnational crimes (eco-crimes), both acknowledging corporate liability. Also in recent years, the International Monsanto Tribunal – an opinion tribunal – found the Monsanto multinational enterprise responsible for ecocide: although not binding, its advisory opinion tackles most of the critical issues arising from corporate environmental crime. After a review of the case, the article analyses the Draft Convention Ecocide, focusing on the main features of this crime and the corporate liability system provided. Albeit some aspects could be subject to critics, the project has several strengths, particularly for its pragmatic approach to corporate remediation, and also aimed at fostering the dialogue between the national States through the approval of a specific convention.

在过去的五十年中，关于在国际上引入国际上的生态灭绝罪和公司责任的辩论一直很激烈。最近的一项研究项目拟定了关于超国家灭绝种族罪和跨国犯罪（生态犯罪）的两项公约草案，均承认公司责任。同样在最近几年，国际孟山都法庭（一个意见法庭）发现孟山都跨国公司对生态灭绝负有责任：尽管它没有约束力，但其咨询意见解决了公司环境犯罪引起的大多数关键问题。在对案件进行审查之后，文章分析了《灭绝种族罪公约草案》，重点关注了该罪行的主要特征和所提供的公司责任制度。尽管某些方面可能会受到批评，但该项目具有多个优势，