In 2020, almost all research labs in industry, academia, and the government were shut down for long periods of time by political leaders to control the spread of the coronavirus. We consider the “micro” and “macro” implications of ongoing coronavirus disruptions in scientific research and the dissemination and commercialization of that research. We have identified three key unanswered research questions regarding these unprecedented disruptions: (1) How is the pandemic affecting conventional measures of scientific output (the quantity and quality of basic research) and performance, social networks, and the strategic management of innovation? (2) How is the pandemic affecting technology transfer offices, incubators, accelerators, science and technology parks, and other aspects of the innovation ecosystem? (3) How do pandemic disruptions affect micro-level factors, such as role conflict, identity, work-life balance, equity, diversity, inclusion, “championing,” leadership, and organizational justice?

中文翻译：

---

隔离、封锁和“重新开放”对科学商业化的影响：微观和宏观问题

2020年，几乎所有工业、学术和政府的研究实验室都被政治领导人长期关闭，以控制冠状病毒的传播。我们考虑了持续的冠状病毒干扰对科学研究以及该研究的传播和商业化的“微观”和“宏观”影响。我们已经确定了关于这些前所未有的破坏的三个关键的未解决的研究问题：（1）大流行如何影响科学产出（基础研究的数量和质量）和绩效、社交网络和创新战略管理的传统衡量标准？(2) 大流行对技术转移办公室、孵化器、加速器、科技园区有何影响，以及创新生态系统的其他方面？(3) 大流行中断如何影响微观层面的因素，例如角色冲突、身份认同、工作与生活的平衡、公平、多样性、包容性、“倡导”、领导力和组织公正？