In this study I provide a thematic comparison of Søren Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling and Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals to suggest that the representation of the ethical in Fear and Trembling is transparently Kantian. At times I draw on Kant’s Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, Conflict of the Faculties, and The Metaphysics of Morals to offer a comprehensive account of Kant’s ethical theory. Both philosophers hold profoundly important positions within the milieu of ethics, however they have always shared a tenuous and at times negative relationship. In this study, I challenge such commentators by showing that when the figure of Abraham is taken typologically and excluded from the text, what emerges from Fear and Trembling is a Kantian based ethics. I argue that a comparative reading of Kant’s Groundwork and Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling reveals that Kierkegaard’s thought gravitates towards three central principles of Kant’s categorical imperative, as well sharing some similarities with Kant’s understanding of duty.

在这项研究中，我对索伦·基尔凯郭尔的《恐惧与恐惧》和伊曼纽尔·康德的《道德形而上学基础》进行了主题比较，以表明伦理在《恐惧与颤抖》中的表现是康德式的。有时我会在纯粹理性，职权冲突和道德形而上学的边界内借鉴康德的宗教全面介绍康德的道德理论。两位哲学家在道德环境中都拥有极为重要的地位，但是他们始终有着微弱的，有时是消极的关系。在这项研究中，我通过展示当亚伯拉罕的形象被从类型上加以考虑并从文本中排除时，向这样的评论家提出了挑战，《恐惧与颤抖》中出现的是基于康德的伦理学。我认为，对康德的《基础工作》和克尔凯郭尔的《恐惧与颤抖》的比较阅读表明，克尔凯郭尔的思想倾向于康德绝对命令的三项核心原则，并且与康德对职责的理解有一些相似之处。