The present article is the first of a trilogy of papers, devoted to analysing the influence of semantic Platonism on contemporary philosophy of language. In the present article, I lay out the discussion by contrasting semantic Platonism with two other views of linguistic meaning: the socio-environmental conception of meaning and semantic anti-representationalism. Then, I identify six points in which the impregnation of semantic theory with Platonism can be particularly felt, resulting in shortcomings and inaccuracies of various kinds. These points are the following: the limitations of regarding logico-philosophical analysis as the only working methodology; the tendency to avoid investigating a number of aspects of linguistic meaning; the recurring confusion between sentences, statements, and propositions; the weakness of transcendent assumptions about meaning; the weakness of meaning assumptions adopted on the basis of pure intuition; and inconsistencies caused by some over-eager attempts to escape semantic Platonism.

本文是论文三部曲的第一篇，致力于分析语义柏拉图主义对当代语言哲学的影响。在本文中，我通过将语义柏拉图主义与其他两种语言意义的观点进行对比来进行讨论：语义的社会环境概念和语义反代表主义。然后，我确定了六个要点，在这些要点上可以特别感受到柏拉图主义对语义理论的渗透，从而导致各种缺陷和不准确性。这些要点如下：将逻辑哲学分析作为唯一的工作方法的局限性；倾向于避免调查语言含义的多个方面的趋势；句子，陈述和命题之间反复出现的混乱；超越意义的假设的弱点；在纯粹直觉的基础上采用的意义假设的弱点；以及因过度渴望逃避语义柏拉图主义而引起的不一致。