There is now an established literature on the link between later Wittgenstein and enactivist approaches in cognitive science. However, is this link not just a matter for card carrying Wittgensteinians? Can enactivists not manage perfectly well without Wittgenstein? In this paper, I show why some enactivists should care about Wittgenstein. Focusing on the enactivist view, “Sensorimotor Identity”. I argue that proponents of this view can use Wittgensteinian considerations to resolve an issue confronting their view and thereby shore up their proposed dissolution of the explanatory gap. Some enactivists thus have in fact much to gain by engaging with Wittgenstein.

中文翻译：

---

为什么Enactivists应该关心维特根斯坦

现在已有关于后期维特根斯坦与认知科学中的生成主义方法之间联系的既定文献。然而，这个链接不只是携带维特根斯坦人的卡片的问题吗？没有维特根斯坦，行动主义者就不能很好地管理吗？在这篇论文中，我展示了为什么一些行动主义者应该关心维特根斯坦。专注于生成主义者的观点，“感觉运动身份”。我认为这种观点的支持者可以使用维特根斯坦的考虑来解决他们观点面临的问题，从而支持他们提议的解释性差距的消解。因此，一些行动主义者实际上通过与维特根斯坦接触而获益良多。