In his Tractatus de Consequentiis, the 14th century logician John Buridan states a theorem, which reads like a refutation of Aristotelian Syllogistics. Syllogistics in its usual form, indeed, faces problems when propositions about the divine persons are involved, and, in some cases, when past- or future-tense propositions occur. Buridan offers different ways of overcoming some of these obstacles. The first aim of this paper is to analyse these ways, the second aim is to draw some conclusions concerning Buridan’s understanding of logic and its relation to theology.

中文翻译：

---

布里丹对逻辑的世俗划分

14 世纪的逻辑学家 John Buridan 在他的 Tractatus de Consequentiis 中陈述了一个定理，读起来像是对亚里士多德三段论的反驳。实际上，当涉及有关神位的命题时，以及在某些情况下，出现过去时态或将来时态命题时，通常形式的三段论会面临问题。Buridan 提供了克服其中一些障碍的不同方法。本文的第一个目的是分析这些方式，第二个目的是就布里丹对逻辑的理解及其与神学的关系得出一些结论。