Abstract This paper intends to offer a new supplement to a corrupt passage of the Epicurean inscription of Oenoanda. Smith, in the lacuna of Fr. 6, uses the phrasal term πρῶτα σώματα to indicate the atoms. The supplement is not satisfying as it is based solely on evidence drawn from non-Epicurean texts and Lucretius, who writes in Latin and is not always reliable for reconstructing the Epicurean terminology. In this article, I will try to demonstrate that πρῶτα σώματα is in fact a peripatetic – and subsequently stoic – term indicating the elements in general, which has never been used by any Epicurean author for polemical reasons. Finally, I will propose an alternative supplement.

中文翻译：

---

奥诺安达神父第欧根尼的新补充。6 史密斯：伊壁鸠鲁语言选择案例

摘要 本文旨在为奥诺安达伊壁鸠鲁铭文的一段腐败段落提供新的补充。史密斯，在神父的空缺中。6、使用短语πρῶτα σώματα 来表示原子。该增刊并不令人满意，因为它完全基于非伊壁鸠鲁文本和卢克莱修的证据，卢克莱修用拉丁文写作，并不总是可靠地重建伊壁鸠鲁的术语。在这篇文章中，我将尝试证明 πρῶτα σώματα 实际上是一个游走的——随后是坚忍的——术语，表示一般的元素，由于争论的原因，任何伊壁鸠鲁派的作者从未使用过。最后，我将提出一个替代补充。