summary:

Livy’s narrative of the 169 b.c.e. invasion of Macedonia led by the consul Q. Marcius Philippus is of particular interest because his principal source here, Polybius, accompanied the Roman army (Polyb. 28.13.1–6). However, the text of Book 44 is based on a single lacunose, jumbled, and corrupt manuscript dating to the fifth century c.e. and known as the Codex Vindobonensis or V. In this article we address textual problems in the narrative, both those represented by cruces in Briscoe’s Teubner edition of Books 41–45 and others where currently accepted emendations seem to us capable of improvement.

概括：

利维（Livy）对公元前169年入侵马其顿的叙述是由领事Q.马修斯·菲利普斯（Marcius Philippus）领导的，因为他的主要来历波利比乌斯（Polybius）陪伴着罗马军队（Polyb。28.13.1-6）。但是，第44本书的文字是基于单一的月见草，混乱且腐败的手抄本，可追溯到公元5世纪，被称为法典Vindobonensis或V。在本文中，我们着眼于叙事中的文字问题，两者均由粗体代表在布里斯科（Briscoe）的Teubner版本41–45中，以及在我们看来似乎可以改进的当前接受的其他修订中。