Abstract:

Different academic disciplines have divergent views on late Chosŏn Buddhism. Many literature scholars and art historians reject the idea that Chosŏn elite travelers could be Buddhist pilgrims, maintaining that the elite justified their trips to Buddhist pilgrimage sites by citing Daoist and Neo-Confucian ideas. Specialists in Korean history and religions, on the other hand, argue that Chosŏn literati were involved with Buddhism in various forms, showing more than philosophical interest in Buddhist doctrine. Pursuing a multi-disciplinary approach that combines art historical and literary evidence while considering the latest historical and religious studies research, this article introduces rarely studied material revealing the wide range of Chosŏn-period Buddhist travelers and their motives for going to Kŭmgangsan. Finally, it focuses on a site-specific analysis of Myogilsang in Inner Kŭmgang, which indicates that at least in some cases routine Buddhist practices were part of a scholar's life. The research presented confirms the popularity of Kŭmgangsan as a Buddhist pilgrimage site in late Chosŏn Korea, supplementing Daoist and Neo-Confucian narratives that currently predominate art history and literature scholarship.

摘要：

不同的学科对朝鲜晚期佛教有不同的看法。许多文学学者和艺术史学家拒绝认为朝鲜精英旅行者可以是佛教徒朝圣者的观点，坚持认为精英分子通过引用道家思想和新儒家思想为他们前往佛教朝圣之旅辩护。另一方面，韩国历史和宗教专家认为，朝鲜文人卷入了各种形式的佛教活动，这不仅显示出对佛教教义的哲学兴趣。本文采用艺术史和文学证据相结合的多学科方法，同时考虑了最新的历史和宗教研究，本文介绍了很少研究的资料，这些资料揭示了朝鲜时期佛教旅行者的广泛分布以及他们前往昆山的动机。最后，它着重于对内贡姆冈的Myogilsang进行针对特定地点的分析，这表明至少在某些情况下，例行佛教活动是学者生活的一部分。提交的研究证实了朝鲜民主主义人民共和国在朝鲜朝鲜朝拜佛教圣地的重要性，从而补充了道教和新儒家的叙事，而叙事目前占据了艺术史和文学学术的主导地位。