This article offers a broad analysis of the “name issue,” its origins, background and the challenges ahead in light of the Prespa agreement. It posits the historical perspective of both identities, assesses the positions maintained by the parties during the political and diplomatic dispute settlement process and presents the concerns of both parties regarding the agreement. Given the content of the Prespa agreement, the article aims at mapping its essential theoretical frame, explaining the key arrangements in the Prespa agreement and identifying the challenges associated with its implementation that might stand in the way of the accomplishment of its purported “historic” mission of settling the long-lasting disagreements between the two parties, offering some recommendations in that respect.

本文根据Prespa协议对“名称问题”，其起源，背景以及未来的挑战进行了广泛的分析。它提出了两种身份的历史观点，评估了双方在政治和外交争端解决过程中所持的立场，并提出了双方对协议的关注。鉴于Prespa协议的内容，本文旨在绘制其基本的理论框架，解释Prespa协议中的关键安排，并确定与实施该协议相关的挑战，这些挑战可能会阻碍其所谓的“历史性”任务的实现解决双方之间长期存在的分歧，并在这方面提出一些建议。