This study considers Paul Ricoeur’s theory of discourses within the context of a phenomenology of religion. I focus on the eighth study of La métaphore vive, wherein Ricoeur explores the possibility of interanimation between speculative and poetic discourses. While Ricoeur is willing to consider the interactions between religious and philosophical discourse in a number of essays, he does not develop the further possibility of the interanimation between religious and speculative thought. I take up this unexplored possibility by suggesting that metaphors are capable of slipping between discourses and animating speculative and religious discourses. Specifically, I use Jean-Louis Chrétien’s metaphor of “wounding” as a case study wherein the phenomenal form of paradox defines one meaning of wounding, while another meaning is connected to a poetic expression that refers to our belonging in the world. Together, the two meanings of the metaphor enliven Chrétien’s phenomenology of religion.

这项研究在宗教现象学的背景下考虑了保罗·里科（Paul Ricoeur）的话语理论。我专注于Lamétaphorevive的第八项研究，其中Ricoeur探索了动画的可能性在投机话语和诗意话语之间。尽管里科（Ricoeur）愿意在许多论文中考虑宗教话语与哲学话语之间的相互作用，但他并未提出宗教与投机思想之间相互影响的进一步可能性。我通过暗示隐喻能够在各种话语之间滑动以及对投机性和宗教性话语进行动画处理来探讨这种未曾探索的可能性。具体来说，我使用让·路易·克雷蒂安（Jean-LouisChrétien）的“受伤”隐喻作为案例研究，其中现象的悖论定义了一种伤害的含义，而另一种含义则与诗意的表达有关，后者表达了我们对世界的归属。隐喻的两种含义共同使克雷蒂安的宗教现象学活跃起来。