Mainstream interpretation segments globalization as: (a) a self-regulating-market neoliberal reincarnation; (b) an innovative regime of information communication technology; or (c) a reorganization of production on a world scale. This segmented view, however, is predicated on the state and the police in the background. In contrast to the mainstream view, which fits globalization in a state-centric prism of the police, we argue that what is referred to as globalization is policing. Policing is founded on household structures that are in turn instituted in the global commodity chains. Accordingly, it is the most crucial element integrating social-identity, social control, and social relations in the modern world-system. Hence, the unfolding prominence of globalization is actually the increasing saliency of policing. It reflects the terminal crisis of the capitalist world-economy, putting pressure on the household structures and the secular trend of accumulation. It is in view of this that policing, under the guise of globalization, is the re-intensification of social control, isolation of social-identities, and reification of social-relations.

主流解释将全球化划分为：（a）自我调节市场的新自由主义轮回；（b）信息通信技术的创新制度；或（c）在世界范围内重组生产。但是，这种分割的视图基于后台的国家和警察。与使全球化适合警察以国家为中心的主流观点相反，我们认为所谓的全球化就是警务。警务工作建立在家庭结构上，而家庭结构又是在全球商品链中建立的。因此，这是在现代世界体系中整合社会认同，社会控制和社会关系的最关键因素。因此，全球化日益突出的事实实际上是警务工作日趋重要的标志。它反映了资本主义世界经济的终极危机，对家庭结构和积累的长期趋势施加了压力。鉴于此，在全球化的幌子下，警务是社会控制的重新加强，社会身份的孤立和社会关系的具体化。