In many times and various ways, some significant Reformed theologians have claimed that biblical theology must be coordinated with or contribute to the task of systematic theology. In these last days, they have even suggested that biblical theology should fill the place of systematic theology. Part One described the way in which Geerhardus Vos, John Murray, and Richard Gaffin have addressed the role of biblical theology in relation to systematic theology and analyzed their arguments. This essay will offer counterproposals regarding the origin, mainstreaming, and end of biblical theology (and theological interpretation of scripture) as exegetical therapies meant to serve the functioning of dogmatics and exegesis.

在许多时候，许多重要的改革宗神学家声称，圣经神学必须与系统神学的任务相协调或作出贡献。在最后的日子里，他们甚至建议圣经神学应该占据系统神学的位置。第一部分描述了Geerhardus Vos，John Murray和Richard Gaffin处理圣经神学在系统神学中的作用的方式，并分析了他们的论点。本文将就圣经神学（和圣经的神学解释）的起源，主流化和终结，作为旨在服务于教条学和释经功能的释义疗法提供反建议。