Differences in race, ethnic origin, gender, belief and worldview, disability and chronic disease, age, and sexual orientation must not be a reason for discriminating against people. Non-discrimination is enshrined as a fundamental right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in numerous subsequent documents and in the constitutions of democratic states. Also the major religions are hostile to discriminatory distinctions. Among the groups that repeatedly experience discrimination are, on the one hand, women, who have to put up with disadvantages even in countries that advocate equality. Secondly, they include people with a homosexual orientation, who sometimes have to endure open rejection. This research uses a sample of N=5363 from 10 countries to examine the attitudes of young people about non-discrimination. Specifically, it asks whether religious belonging and the country of origin show any impact on this attitude, and whether the religiosity of respondents moderates the influence of religion and country. The empirical findings show that discrimination against women is rejected, but with differences between religious groups and countries. Homosexuality is seen more controversially and there is no uniform rejection of discrimination against homosexuals. However, depending on religious affiliation and national context, individual religiosity can have positive and negative effects on the rejection of discrimination.

种族，族裔，性别，信仰和世界观，残疾和慢性病，年龄和性取向方面的差异绝不能成为歧视人的理由。在《世界人权宣言》，随后的许多文件和民主国家的宪法中，不歧视被列为一项基本权利。同样，主要宗教也反对歧视性的区分。在反复遭受歧视的群体中，一方面是妇女，即使在倡导平等的国家中，妇女也必须忍受不利条件。其次，他们包括同性恋倾向的人，有时不得不忍受公开拒绝。这项研究使用来自10个国家的N = 5363样本来检验年轻人对非歧视的态度。具体来说，它询问宗教归属和原籍国是否对这种态度有任何影响，以及受访者的宗教信仰是否减轻了宗教和国家的影响。实证结果表明，对妇女的歧视被拒绝，但宗教团体和国家之间存在差异。同性恋争议更大，没有一律拒绝歧视同性恋者。但是，根据宗教信仰和国家背景的不同，个人宗教信仰可能对拒绝歧视产生积极和消极的影响。但是宗教团体和国家之间存在差异。同性恋争议更大，没有一律拒绝歧视同性恋者。但是，根据宗教信仰和国家背景的不同，个人宗教信仰可能对拒绝歧视产生积极和消极的影响。但是宗教团体和国家之间存在差异。同性恋争议更大，没有一律拒绝歧视同性恋者。但是，根据宗教信仰和国家背景的不同，个人宗教信仰可能对拒绝歧视产生积极和消极的影响。