The dual legal system of religious and civil law in Israel and the existence of a religious court system alongside a civil one causes distortions in the implementation of the rights and duties of husbands and wives. Due to this duality, in practice, in Israel, there is neither religious law nor law based on equality. This hybrid legal system leads to the reinforcement of what I will call here “patriarchal liberalism,” which means that there is a development in a liberal direction alongside obstacles and barriers that prevent advancement to full equality between men and women. Although this legal hybridity leads to the introduction of liberal norms into the legal relations between men and women, it also preserves patriarchal features. This article focuses on child support allotted to Muslim children in family courts in Israel. Since 2001, both shariʿa courts and family courts may rule in matters of child support for Muslim children, which means that there is parallel jurisdiction between the Muslim religious law according to religious belonging of the parties involved in cases.

以色列的宗教和民法双重法律体系以及宗教法庭体系与民事体系的并存，导致丈夫和妻子的权利和义务的执行情况发生扭曲。由于这种双重性，实际上，在以色列，既没有宗教法律，也没有基于平等的法律。这种混合的法律制度导致了我在这里所说的“父权制自由主义”的加强，这意味着自由主义方向上的发展与阻碍男女全面发展的障碍和障碍有关。尽管这种法律上的混杂导致将自由规范引入男女之间的法律关系，但它也保留了父权制的特征。本文重点介绍以色列家庭法院为穆斯林儿童分配的子女抚养费。自2001年以来，