当前位置: X-MOL 学术Contemporary Pragmatism › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Philosophical Disagreement and the Value-Laden Nature of Philosophy
Contemporary Pragmatism ( IF <0.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-21 , DOI: 10.1163/18758185-01604008
Gustavo Arroyo 1
Affiliation  

Disagreement in philosophy is all-pervasive and irresolvable. There is almost no thesis in philosophy about which philosophers agree. In contrast to most contemporary accounts of philosophical disagreement, I argue that a significant proportion of philosophical disagreements are rooted in differences regarding values. A second thesis that I shall defend in this paper is that disagreements regarding values are not resolvable by argumentative means.



中文翻译:

哲学分歧与哲学的价值取向

哲学上的分歧无处不在,无法解决。哲学家几乎没有关于哲学家同意的论点。与当代大多数关于哲学分歧的论述相反,我认为,很大一部分哲学分歧源于价值观差异。在本文中,我将要捍卫的第二个论点是,关于价值的分歧是无法通过争论的手段解决的。

更新日期:2019-11-21
down
wechat
bug