This article intends to confront the perspectives of Axel Honneth and Judith Butler on solidarity. Honneth emphasizes the role of identities and a notion of solidarity connected to cultural backgrounds, shared narratives and world images. Butler, on the other hand, fears that this form of solidarity, based on similitudes, might lead to social narcissism. She believes that it is possible to foster another kind of solidarity, one based on our shared vulnerability and on experiences that can make us recognize that we are not identical to ourselves. Investigating the tensions between these two very dissimilar points of view will help to explore possible connections between post-identitarian forms of solidarity and affects such as desire and mourning, which are frequently at stake in social struggles.

本文旨在面对Axel Honneth和Judith Butler关于团结的观点。霍内斯（Honneth）强调身份的作用以及与文化背景，共享叙事和世界形象有关的团结概念。另一方面，巴特勒担心这种基于相似性的团结形式可能导致社会自恋。她认为，有可能促进另一种团结，这是基于我们共同的脆弱性和可以使我们认识到我们与自己不同的经验的团结。研究这两种截然不同的观点之间的紧张关系，将有助于探索认同后形式的团结与诸如欲望和哀悼之类的影响之间可能存在的联系，而这在社会斗争中经常受到威胁。