This paper presents Christian Wolff’s claim that philosophy, undertaken on the basis of a proper method, cannot contradict revealed religion. The paper first provides a context of Wolff’s banishment from Halle for holding views in conflict with religious doctrines. Next, it proceeds, on the basis of Wolff’s Discursus præliminaris de philosophia in genere prefixed to his 1728 Latin Logic, to explain the principles of Wolff’s method, and to show how his conception of method enables him to disallow the possibility of a genuine conflict between philosophical and religious dogmas. For Wolff, doctrinal conflicts between philosophy and revealed religion can only occur as a result of terminological disagreements, disagreements between dogmas and hypotheses, or disagreements between dogmas and theological misinterpretations. The actual conflict of dogmas, understood as religious or philosophical truths, Wolff holds to be impossible.

本文提出了克里斯蒂安·沃尔夫（Christian Wolff）的主张，即基于适当方法进行的哲学不能与宗教信仰相矛盾。该论文首先提供了从哈勒（Halle）驱逐沃尔夫（Walff）的观点，因为他持有与宗教教义相冲突的观点。接下来，根据沃尔夫的《Discorsuspræliminarisde philosophia》以其1728 Latin Logic开头的体裁继续进行，解释沃尔夫方法的原理，并说明他的方法概念如何使他排除哲学和宗教教义之间真正冲突的可能性。对于沃尔夫而言，哲学与宗教信仰之间的教义冲突只能是由于术语上的分歧，教条与假设之间的分歧，或者教条与神学上的误解之间的分歧而导致的。沃尔夫认为，教条的实际冲突是宗教或哲学真理，被认为是不可能的。