This article compares the Targum with Masoretic cantillations. The comparison between the different reading traditions shows agreement in everything concerning the division between one verse and the next. Usually, there is agreement in the division within each verse as well, particularly when both the cantillations and the Targum respond to an ideological or exegetical problem in the text. Juxtaposing the cantillations and the Targum in this manner may also reveal aspects of the stages of development of these two interpretative tools in relation to one another. Comparing Targumim and Babylonian cantillations also strengthens the assessment that the Tiberian system of accents was influenced by the Targum in its division of the verses. In addition, examining the way each verse is divided shows how the Targum seems to prefer a subordinate structure even when it translates paratactic clauses.

本文将 Targum 与 Masoretic cantillations 进行比较。不同阅读传统之间的比较表明，关于一节经文和下一节经文之间的划分，一切都是一致的。通常，每节经文的划分也是一致的，特别是当颂歌和塔古姆都回应文本中的意识形态或解经问题时。以这种方式将颂词和 Targum 并列在一起，也可以揭示这两种解释工具彼此相关的发展阶段的各个方面。比较Targumim 和巴比伦的cantilations 也加强了对Tiberian 口音系统在其诗节划分中受Targum 影响的评估。此外，