当前位置: X-MOL 学术Aramaic Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are Literary Languages Artificial? The Case of the Aramaic of the Zohar
Aramaic Studies ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-08 , DOI: 10.1163/17455227-bja10002
Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal 1
Affiliation  

Few studies have focused on the Aramaic of the Zohar, and to this day, only one of these presents a completed grammatical analysis. Scholars have dealt at large, however, with the question of whether the Aramaic of the Zohar is artificial or not. I briefly review the history of the literature around this question, then propose my own criteria to examine whether a language of a given text is indeed artificial. Finally, I put this methodology into practice, as I investigate the nature of Zoharic Aramaic by examining specific linguistic phenomena in the relevant corpus.



中文翻译:

文学语言是人为的吗?Zohar的Aramaic案

很少有研究集中在Zohar的阿拉姆语,而到目前为止,只有其中一项提出了完整的语法分析。然而,学者们普遍讨论了Zohar的Aramaic是否是人造的问题。我简要回顾了有关该问题的文学史,然后提出了自己的标准,以检验给定文本的语言是否确实是人为的。最后,当我通过检查相关语料库中的特定语言现象来研究Zoharic Aramaic的性质时,我将这种方法付诸实践。

更新日期:2020-05-08
down
wechat
bug