当前位置: X-MOL 学术Arab Law Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Need to Re-examine the Route of Pre-emption Law in the Sudan: A Critical Analysis
Arab Law Quarterly ( IF 0.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-09 , DOI: 10.1163/15730255-bja10063
Hafiz Gaffar Ibrahim Ismail 1
Affiliation  

This article examines the concept of pre-emption rights in the Sudan, in particular, the origin, nature and domain of the principle by making four key arguments. Firstly, it argues that, although the doctrine is maintained and applied as a part of Muslim law, it is also applied between Muslims and non-Muslims as equity and good conscience rule rather than as a part of Muslim personal law. Secondly, it presupposes that the doctrine of pre-emption has its roots in Islamic law, although it is not ‘exclusive’ to Islamic systems. Thirdly, it suggests that the tendency to adopt Islamic theory as a sole reason for implementing the doctrine, sometimes led to judicial debates; for example, the question arose to whether this right existed in favour of a lease holder. Finally, Islamic theory leaves the question open as to whether pre-emptive rights exist in the domain of movable property.



中文翻译:

重新审视苏丹优先购买法路径的必要性:批判性分析

本文通过提出四个关键论点来研究苏丹优先购买权的概念,特别是该原则的起源、性质和领域。首先,它争辩说,尽管该教义作为穆斯林法律的一部分得到维护和适用,但它也作为公平和良心规则而不是穆斯林属人法的一部分适用于穆斯林和非穆斯林之间。其次,它假定先发制人的学说源于伊斯兰法律,尽管它不是伊斯兰制度的“排他性”。第三,它表明采用伊斯兰理论作为实施该学说的唯一理由的趋势有时会导致司法辩论;例如,问题是这种权利是否有利于租赁持有人。最后,

更新日期:2020-11-09
down
wechat
bug