当前位置: X-MOL 学术Arab Law Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An Analysis of Jordanian Jurisdiction as a Seat for International Arbitration
Arab Law Quarterly ( IF 0.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-22 , DOI: 10.1163/15730255-bja10059
Zaid M. Aladwan 1 , Mutaz M. Aladwan 2
Affiliation  

Arbitration is the best method to resolve a dispute, due to the flexibility in its mechanism and issuing of a final judgment, known as an ‘award’. The winning party usually seeks to apply that award in the state where the assets of the losing party exist. In this regard, the New York Convention 1958 guarantees that the award is enforceable in the state where the winning party sought to apply. Jordan is party to the Convention; it has regulated its own arbitration law and has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law 1985. However, not all provisions were adopted where specific provisions in Jordanian law relating to certain matters differed from the Model Law provisions. These differences may positively or adversely affect the arbitration procedure in Jordan.



中文翻译:

约旦管辖权作为国际仲裁地的分析

仲裁是解决争端的最佳方法,这是由于其机制的灵活性和发布最终裁决(称为“裁决”)的原因。获胜方通常试图在败诉方资产存在的州中应用该裁决。在这方面,《 1958年纽约公约》保证了该裁决在获胜方寻求申请的州中可以强制执行。约旦是《公约》的缔约国;它已经规范了自己的仲裁法,并采用了《贸易法委员会1985年示范法》。但是,如果约旦法律中与某些事项有关的特定规定与示范法规定有所不同,则并非所有规定都被采用。这些分歧可能对约旦的仲裁程序产生正面或负面的影响。

更新日期:2020-10-22
down
wechat
bug