This article highlights the gaps and difficulties that face the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Palestinian courts. In addition, it constructs recommendations for legal and judicial approaches that the Palestinian Authority should adopt to create a ‘pro-arbitration’ system. The article first provides a general analysis of the regulatory deficiencies in the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards, which include the inapplicability of the New York Convention, the existence of the reciprocity principle as a condition of enforcement, and the lack of presumptive obligation of recognising the validity of arbitration awards in Palestine. Afterward, the article focuses on the procedural level of enforcing foreign arbitration awards. It addresses difficulties that face the award-creditor when attempting to enforce the award through the competent court, as well as the Palestinian courts’ approach when reviewing the exequatur, and how this attitude affects the granting enforcement.

本文重点介绍了在巴勒斯坦法院执行外国仲裁裁决所面临的差距和困难。此外，它还为巴勒斯坦权力机构应采用的法律和司法方法提出建议，以创建“支持仲裁”的系统。文章首先对外国仲裁裁决执行中的监管缺陷进行了一般性分析，包括《纽约公约》的不适用、互惠原则作为执行条件的存在以及缺乏承认该裁决的推定义务。仲裁裁决在巴勒斯坦的有效性。随后，文章重点讨论了执行外国仲裁裁决的程序层面。