Purpose

This paper aims to compare the implementation of public–private partnership (PPP) in Western and non-Western countries by analyzing several predetermined aspects such as government and political system, PPP’s model of agreement, political commitment and the role of PPP supporting unit.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses comparative case studies to compare the implementation of PPP in seven Western and non-Western countries by using various appropriate data such as frequently used agreements, government systems, political commitments and PPP-supporting units to understand the extent of differences in the success of PPP implementation found in each country.

Findings

The results reveal that the implementation of PPPs in Western and non-Western countries do not significantly differ, except for in the instance of political commitments. Political interventions in PPP implementation still frequently occurred in non-Western countries, which consequently disrupted the implementation of PPP itself.

Originality/value

Previous comparison of PPP studies only focused on the implementation of PPP without analyzing the political context in each country. One of the contributions that this paper will bring to the conversations around PPP is that the implementation of PPP will be analyzed with regard to political contexts.

中文翻译：

---

西方和非西方国家的公私合作伙伴关系：寻求相关性

目的

本文旨在通过分析政府和政治体系，PPP的协议模式，政治承诺以及PPP支持单位的作用等几个预定方面，比较西方和非西方国家公私伙伴关系（PPP）的实施情况。

设计/方法/方法

这项研究使用比较案例研究，通过使用各种适当的数据（例如经常使用的协议，政府系统，政治承诺和PPP支持单位）了解七个成功的差异程度，从而比较了七个西方国家和非西方国家的PPP实施情况每个国家/地区实施PPP的比例。

发现

结果表明，除了在政治承诺方面，西方国家和非西方国家在PPP的实施方面没有显着差异。在非西方国家，实施PPP的政治干预措施仍然频繁发生，因此破坏了PPP本身的实施。

创意/价值

先前对PPP研究的比较只关注PPP的实施，而没有分析每个国家的政治背景。本文将为围绕PPP的对话带来的贡献之一是，将针对政治背景分析PPP的实施。