Purpose

This paper mentions the quick reactions of Vietnam to avoid explosive catastrophes before and during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic. The work presented here has profound implications for future research of disaster response and preparation for future pandemics. In order to estimate the causal general effect of the pandemic, the authors have to do a quantitative survey at the end of the pandemic.

Design/methodology/approach

The difference in damage caused by the pandemic between the great powers and Vietnam is the quick reaction. It plays a decisive role. In attempting to tackle emerging phenomena in the pandemic, this study is deliberately broad-based. Considerable attention is given to explaining each methodological choice. It centers on a core case of Vietnam. Using data from multiple methods, it adopts publish media and contemporary research during the pandemic as a way to draw out key themes within the core case.

Findings

The paper focuses on the lessons for the post-pandemic consist of the Buddhist conception (cause and effect) based on the quick reaction of the Vietnamese government and the adaptation of Vietnamese people. This is a key success for the future anti-pandemic process.

Research limitations/implications

The paper is not exploring the pandemic within a larger scale of all nations to approach a general lesson for the world.

Practical implications

The success of the first anti-pandemic phase does not guarantee that subsequent efforts will be successful. Respecting the “opponent” (the coronavirus) is the best way to avoid falling into the deadly subjective trap that some great powers have encountered.

Social implications

This article highlights the rapid response of the Vietnamese before and during the coronavirus pandemic. From that, the article draws some lessons for the next similar disasters based on the cause and effect.

Originality/value

A quick reaction is one of the most important ways to deal with any disaster. After a half year of the coronavirus pandemic spread, Vietnam has 408 infectious cases and no deaths within 96,208,984 people (The Ministry of Health of Vietnam on July 22nd, 2020). Vietnam achieved success with the least expensive price that should be finding in risks and issues in the future.

中文翻译：

---

风险和问题：越南在第一轮冠状病毒大流行中的反应和对世界的经验

目的

本文提到越南在避免第一轮冠状病毒大流行之前和期间爆发爆炸性灾难的迅速反应。此处介绍的工作对未来的灾难响应研究和未来的大流行准备具有深远的意义。为了估计大流行的因果关系，作者必须在大流行结束时进行定量调查。

设计/方法/方法

大国与越南之间由大流行引起的破坏差异是快速反应。它起着决定性的作用。在试图解决大流行中的新出现现象时，这项研究是有广泛基础的。在解释每种方法选择时都给予了极大的关注。它以越南的核心案例为中心。它使用多种方法的数据，在大流行期间采用出版媒体和当代研究作为在核心案例中得出关键主题的方法。

发现

本文主要针对大流行后的教训，其中包括基于越南政府的快速反应和越南人民的适应而产生的佛教观念（因果关系）。这是未来反大流行过程的关键成功。

研究局限/意义

本文并没有在更大范围的所有国家中探索这种流行病，以为世界提供一般性的教训。

实际影响

第一个抗大流行阶段的成功并不保证随后的努力将获得成功。尊重“对手”（冠状病毒）是避免掉入一些大国已经遇到的致命主观陷阱的最好方法。

社会影响

本文重点介绍了越南人在冠状病毒大流行之前和期间的快速反应。由此，本文基于因果关系为下一次类似的灾难吸取了一些教训。

创意/价值

快速反应是应对任何灾难的最重要方法之一。经过半年的冠状病毒大流行，越南共感染408例传染病，没有死亡96,208,984人（越南卫生部，2020年7月22日）。越南以最便宜的价格取得了成功，该价格将来会出现在风险和问题中。