当前位置: X-MOL 学术Irish Economic and Social History › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Book review: Children and the Great Hunger in Ireland
Irish Economic and Social History ( IF 0.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1177/0332489320969995g
Marnie Hay 1
Affiliation  

text. It is important to remember that the number of manuscripts pertaining to Irish Presbyterians in the period surveyed are relatively few and far between. And those that do exist are often concerned with matters of a personal or political nature. The author has, nevertheless, made good use of the J. Gresham Machen papers housed in the Montgomery Library, Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, which include some crucial insights on the Davey controversy. Other readers may be disappointed that certain subjects are only addressed in summary form. For instance, the author’s discussion of the 1859 revival is a descriptive taxonomy of various opinions on the revival, which does not help the reader to determine which view was historically correct. Given the broad time frame and the range of topics that the book covers, however, it would be unrealistic to expect in-depth analysis of every subject addressed. One point that needs to be emphasised in relation to Henry Cooke is that his call for greater cooperation with the Church of Ireland was not, as his critics misrepresented it, a demand that they unite with those who persecuted their seventeenth-century forebears. Instead, Cooke was seeking greater unity with Church of Ireland evangelicals, many of whom were Reformed, while at the same time he denounced both the earlier Laudians and the contemporary Puseyites as cryptoRomanists. These minor points aside, The Irish Presbyterian Mind is an excellent overview of the intellectual history of an important Protestant group, and we hope that it will encourage further research in this neglected field.

中文翻译:

书评:爱尔兰的儿童与大饥荒

文本。重要的是要记住,在调查期间与爱尔兰长老会有关的手稿数量相对较少且相距甚远。而那些确实存在的人往往关注个人或政治性质的问题。尽管如此,作者还是很好地利用了费城威斯敏斯特神学院蒙哥马利图书馆中的 J. Gresham Machen 论文,其中包括对戴维争议的一些重要见解。其他读者可能会对某些主题仅以摘要形式讨论感到失望。例如,作者对1859年复兴的讨论是对复兴的各种观点的描述性分类,这无助于读者确定哪种观点在历史上是正确的。然而,鉴于本书涵盖的广泛时间框架和主题范围,期望对所讨论的每个主题进行深入分析是不现实的。关于亨利·库克,需要强调的一点是,他呼吁与爱尔兰教会加强合作,而不是像他的批评者所曲解的那样,要求他们与那些迫害 17 世纪祖先的人联合起来。相反,库克正在寻求与爱尔兰福音派的更大团结,其中许多人是改革宗,同时他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普西派是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教团体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。关于亨利·库克,需要强调的一点是,他呼吁与爱尔兰教会加强合作,而不是像他的批评者所曲解的那样,要求他们与那些迫害 17 世纪祖先的人联合起来。相反,库克正在寻求与爱尔兰福音派的更大团结,其中许多人是改革宗,同时他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普西派是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教群体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。关于亨利·库克,需要强调的一点是,他呼吁与爱尔兰教会加强合作,而不是像他的批评者所曲解的那样,要求他们与那些迫害 17 世纪祖先的人联合起来。相反,库克正在寻求与爱尔兰福音派的更大团结,其中许多人是改革宗,同时他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普西派是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教群体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。正如他的批评者所曲解的那样,要求他们与那些迫害他们 17 世纪祖先的人联合起来。相反,库克正在寻求与爱尔兰福音派的更大团结,其中许多人是改革宗,同时他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普西派是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教群体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。正如他的批评者所曲解的那样,要求他们与那些迫害他们 17 世纪祖先的人联合起来。相反,库克正在寻求与爱尔兰福音派的更大团结,其中许多人是改革宗,同时他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普西派是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教群体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。与此同时,他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普赛派都是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教群体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。与此同时,他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普赛派都是加密罗马主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》很好地概述了一个重要的新教群体的思想史,我们希望它能鼓励对这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug