This article explores the perceptions of justice expressed by victims of severe violations of human rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) who have testified before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and/or the Court of BiH. In 2009, we surveyed 495 members of a victims’ association and inquired about their perceptions of postwar justice. The respondents were more likely to assess the ICTY than the Court of BiH as fair both in terms of its decisions and procedures. Compared to the perceptions of procedural justice, perceptions of distributive justice were more strongly correlated with the assessments of both courts’ overall fairness. Multivariate logistic regression models reveal that measures of procedural justice are directly related to the respondents’ evaluations of the both courts’ fairness, while demographic factors were mostly unrelated to their evaluations of the two courts. The results of our study suggest that the respondents who said that they testified at the ICTY had more positive views about both the ICTY and the Court of BiH than the respondents who said that they either testified at both courts or only at the Court of BiH.

本文探讨了在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那（波黑）遭受严重侵犯人权行为的受害者所表达的正义感，这些受害者已在前南斯拉夫国际刑事法庭（ICTY）和/或波黑法院中作证。2009年，我们对受害者协会的495名成员进行了调查，并询问了他们对战后正义的看法。在波黑法院的决定和程序上，与波黑法院相比，被告人更可能评估前南问题国际法庭。与程序正义的观念相比，分配正义的观念与两个法院的整体公正性评估之间的联系更为紧密。多元logistic回归模型显示，程序公正性的衡量标准与被告对两个法院公平性的评估直接相关，而人口因素大多与他们对两个法院的评估无关。我们的研究结果表明，说他们在前南问题国际法庭作证的被调查者比说他们在两个法院或仅在波黑法院作证的被调查者对前南问题国际法庭和波黑法院都有更积极的看法。