The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court. This overview reports five cases in total. First, there are three cases on the Posted Workers Directive. The first two are on the dismissal of the annulment procedures regarding the adoption of the new Posted Workers Directive (Directive 2018/957) started by Hungary (C-620/18) and Poland (C-626/18). Then, the FNV case (C-815/18), which is on the application of the Posted Workers Directive (Directive 96/71) to the transnational provision of services in the road transport sector, is discussed. The overview continues onto other subjects, with a follow-up of the Dano and Alimanovic saga in the Job Center Krefeld case (C-181/19), which relates to the access to social assistance for a job-seeker who is the primary carer of a child receiving education in the host Member State. From there, commentary is given on the A v. Veselï bas ministrija case, which deals with the difficult balance between the freedom of religion and the system of prior authorization for planned healthcare. Finally, the Syndicat CFTC case (C-463/19) is reviewed, and it concerns the conditions under which an additional maternity leave can be reserved to female workers without being considered as discriminatory.

就社会保障的重要判决而言，本报告所述期间（2020年9月至2020年12月）是一个特别紧张的时期，法院大法庭的判决不少于4项。此概述报告了总共五个案例。首先，《已发布工人指令》涉及三种情况。前两个是关于取消采用由匈牙利（C-620 / 18）和波兰（C-626 / 18）发起的新《张贴工人指令》（2018/957号指令）的废止程序。然后，讨论了FNV案（C-815 / 18），该案是关于“张贴工人指令”（96/71号指令）在公路运输行业跨国服务中的应用的。概述将继续涉及其他主题，并对Dano和Alimanovic故事在Job Center Krefeld案（C-181 / 19）中发生，涉及到求职者获得社会救助的机会，该求职者是所在成员国接受教育的孩子的主要照顾者。从那里开始，对A v。Veselïbas ministrija案进行评论，该案处理了宗教自由与计划中的医疗保健事先授权制度之间的艰难平衡。最后，对辛迪加特CFTC案（C-463 / 19）进行了审查，该案涉及在什么条件下可以为女工保留额外的产假，而不被视为具有歧视性。