当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Social Security › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Digitalisation and social security in the EU. The case of platform work: from work protection to income protection?
European Journal of Social Security ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-18 , DOI: 10.1177/1388262720971300
Paul Schoukens 1
Affiliation  

Platform workers face problems in accessing effective social protection schemes. Furthermore, these workers are not always in a position to build up robust social protection rights even in case they can participate in the schemes. Compared to standard workers, they work in a precarious situation. The small tasks they perform, their geographical mobility and their low earnings are issues that create problems for social security systems’ ability to accommodate these workers. In this contribution, attention to the specific working conditions of platform workers is given; starting from the concept of standard work and a discussion of the way platform work deviates from that performed by standard workers (the original basis used to design traditional social protection schemes). In a second part of this paper, the various challenges that platform work create for social protection schemes are enunciated. In the third part of the contribution, the recent EU Recommendation on access to social protection is used as a yardstick to discuss what kind of answers should be given to accommodate platform workers in social protection schemes. In the final part, conclusions around three elements that are characteristic of platform work, yet not sufficiently addressed in national social protection schemes, nor in the EU Recommendation, are developed. These observations help to establish findings on the future outlook of social protection schemes, which should be inclusive and accommodative for all (new) types of work.

中文翻译:

欧盟的数字化和社会保障。平台工作案例:从工作保障到收入保障?

平台工作者在获得有效的社会保护计划方面面临问题。此外,即使这些工人可以参与这些计划,也并不总是能够建立健全的社会保护权利。与标准工人相比,他们的工作处境岌岌可危。他们执行的小任务、地域流动性和低收入是社会保障系统容纳这些工人的能力的问题。在这篇投稿中,对平台工作者的具体工作条件给予了关注;从标准工作的概念开始,讨论平台工作与标准工人(用于设计传统社会保护计划的原始基础)的工作方式的不同。在本文的第二部分,阐述了平台工作为社会保护计划带来的各种挑战。在文稿的第三部分,以最近欧盟关于获得社会保护的建议作为衡量标准,讨论应该给出什么样的答案来容纳社会保护计划中的平台工作者。在最后一部分,围绕平台工作的三个特征,但在国家社会保护计划和欧盟建议中均未充分解决的三个要素得出结论。这些观察有助于确定社会保护计划未来前景的调查结果,该计划应对所有(新)类型的工作具有包容性和包容性。最近欧盟关于获得社会保护的建议被用作衡量应该给予什么样的答案以适应社会保护计划中的平台工人的标准。在最后一部分,围绕平台工作的三个特征,但在国家社会保护计划和欧盟建议中均未充分解决的三个要素得出结论。这些观察结果有助于确定社会保护计划的未来前景,该计划应对所有(新)类型的工作具有包容性和包容性。最近欧盟关于获得社会保护的建议被用作衡量应该给予什么样的答案以适应社会保护计划中的平台工人的标准。在最后一部分,围绕平台工作的三个特征,但在国家社会保护计划和欧盟建议中均未充分解决的三个要素得出结论。这些观察有助于确定社会保护计划未来前景的调查结果,该计划应对所有(新)类型的工作具有包容性和包容性。尚未在国家社会保护计划或欧盟建议中得到充分解决。这些观察有助于确定社会保护计划未来前景的调查结果,该计划应对所有(新)类型的工作具有包容性和包容性。尚未在国家社会保护计划或欧盟建议中得到充分解决。这些观察有助于确定社会保护计划未来前景的调查结果,该计划应对所有(新)类型的工作具有包容性和包容性。
更新日期:2020-11-18
down
wechat
bug