The Problem

The pandemic and subsequent changes to norms and practices in the workplace mean that for many, existing meaning-making structures are challenged and the limits of existing ways of knowing are revealed. The problem for HRD scholars and practitioners is that dominant approaches to research are largely insufficient for understanding individuals’ meaning making in response to the pandemic.

The Recommendation

Two critically reflexive method/ologies are presented and overlaid with Constructive-Developmental Theory (CDT) to offer not only a means of capturing data about individuals’ experiences during/post-pandemic but for interpreting the data with an understanding of the mental complexities associated with capturing an emic perspective.

The Stakeholders

Stakeholders include HRD scholars and practitioners who conduct research in organizations.

中文翻译：

---

并非所有流浪者都迷失了：对新HRD景观的批判性反思研究

问题

大流行以及随后工作场所规范和惯例的变化意味着，对于许多现有的意义构建结构而言，这些挑战受到了挑战，并且揭示了现有认知方式的局限性。对于HRD学者和从业者来说，问题在于，主流的研究方法在很大程度上不足以理解个体应对大流行的意义。

建议

提出了两种批判性的反思方法/方法论，并与建构发展理论（CDT）重叠，以提供一种手段来获取关于大流行期间/大流行后的个人经历的数据，并通过理解与之相关的心理复杂性来解释该数据。捕捉主观观点。

利益相关者

利益相关者包括在组织中进行研究的人力资源开发学者和实践者。